Sources and Citations - Ohioans For Transparency

Sources and Citations

Endnote # 1.1 & 2.1 & 3.2
EAC: Certified Voting Systems

Endnote # 1.2
EAC: Voluntary Voting System Guidelines

Endnote # 1.3
Transparent Elections NC: Source Code Review & Examination and Security Review of the ExpressVote Electronic Voting System

Endnote # 2.2
EAC: U.S. Election Assistance Commission Adopts New Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 2.0

Endnote # 3.1
Ohio SOS: Certified Voting Systems in Use in Ohio

Endnote # 4 & 12 & 15 & 20 & 21 & 22 & 51
Bev Harris: Black Box Voting: Ballot: Tampering in the 21st Century

Endnote # 5
Texas SOS: Memorandum RE: Dominion Voting Systems- Democracy Suite 5.5-A Voting System Examination

Endnote # 6
Ohio DAS: Mandatory Use Contract for Voting Systems- Contract OT902619

Endnote # 7.1
Ohio DAS: ES&S Quotation for ITB- Contract OT902619

Endnote # 7.2
Escrow Company Co: NCC Group acquires the Iron Mountain software escrow division

Endnote # 8.1
Ohio DAS: Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Quotation for ITB- Contract OT902619

Endnote # 8.2
New Mexico SOS: Report on Dominion Voting System Comprised of Democracy Suite Election Management System 4.14 software, combined with the Dominion ImageCast Evolution, ImageCast Precinct and ImageCast Central tabulators

Endnote # 9
National Election Defense Coalition: How to Rig an Election

Endnote # 10
ToreSays: Dominion's Own FROG Destroys Their Claim

Endnote # 11
Seattle Weekly: Once a Liberal Darling, Bev Harris Still Thinks the Elections are Rigged

Endnote # 13
OpEdNews: Two convicted felons involved with vote by mail

Endnote # 14.1
Equal Justice Foundation: Diebold GEMS Central Tabulator Contains Stunning Security Hole

Endnote # 14.2
Candice Hoke: GEMS Tabulation Database Design Issues in Relation to Voting System Certification Standards

Endnote # 16 & 17 & 18 & 19
DOJ Office of Public Affairs: Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election Solutions Merger

Endnote # 23
Deep Capture: Evidence Grows: '20 Election Was Rigged

Endnote # 24 & 25 & 27 & 28
Brett Simpson for Auditor: Clinton Curtis: Testimony on How Elections Have Been Stolen Using Algorithms Since at Least 2000

Endnote # 26 & 29
Elections at Risk: Computer Programmer Becomes a Whistleblower

Endnote # 30 & 31 & 32
Rumble: Clint Curtis- Statement to Shasta County Board of Supervisors

Endnote # 33 & 34 & 35 & 36
National Security Archive: EVEREST: Evaluation and Validation of Election-Related Equipment, Standards and Testing

Endnote # 37 & 38
University of Michigan Alumni Association: Hacking the Vote: It's Easier Than You Think

Endnote # 39 & 40
ProPublica: The Market for Voting Machines Is Broken. This Company Has Thrived in It.

Endnote # 41 & 42
CVA: "Ceci N' Pas Une Preuve: The Use of Trapdoor Commitments in Bayer-Groth Proofs and the Implications for the Verifiability of the Scytl-Swissport Internet Voting System"

Endnote # 43 & 44 & 45 & 46
ToreSays: Proof That Auditing Election Machines Cannot Detect Manipulation Of Votes

Endnote # 47 & 48 & 49
Atlanta Dist. Ct.: Civil Action No. 1:17-cv2989-AT, Curling v. Raffensperger, Opinion and Order, November 10, 2023

Endnote # 50 & 52
Atlanta Dist. Ct.: Civil Action No. 1:17-cv2989-AT, Curling v. Raffensperger, Halderman Report, June 14, 2023

Endnote # 53 & 54 & 55 & 56 & 57 & 74.2 & 75
E.D. Wis.: Case No. 2:20-cv-01771, Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, December 1, 2020

Endnote # 58 & 76
Atlanta Dist. Ct.: Civil Action No. 1:17-cv2989-AT, Curling v. Raffensperger, Halderman Transcript, January 18, 2024

Endnote # 59 & 60 & 61 & 62 & 63 & 64
D.C. Dist. Ct.: Case No. 1:21-cv-01864, Philip B. Stark v. United States Election Assistance Commission, Complaint,
November 10, 2021

Endnote # 65 & 66
Gateway Pundit: How Can the Government Agency Certifying Elections (the EAC) Maintain Its Independence When Its CIO Previously Worked for 10 Years for Dominion Voting Systems?

Endnote # 67 & 68
Gateway Pundit: Exclusive: The Election Assistance Commission Told the Senate in December 2020 It Had Two Accredited Test Laboratories- In Reality It Had None

Endnote # 69.1
United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: FOIA Response

Endnote # 69.2 & 71.3
NIST Handbook 150-22, 2008 Edition: National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program- Voting System Testing

Endnote # 70
EAC: Letter on VSTL accreditation for Pro V&V

Endnote # 71.1
52 U.S. Code § 20971- Certification and testing of voting systems

Endnote # 71.2 & 74.1
EAC: VSTL Manual 2.0 and VSTL Manual 3.0

Endnote # 72 & 73
EAC: Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Migration